5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
Therefore, if the intent to cause injury is proven and it can be further proven that while in the ordinary course of nature, that injury would lead to death, that matter has become objective along with the intention to get rid of (the main factor that must
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
For a society, it really is essential to continue striving for the just legal system that makes sure fairness, protection, and respect for all individuals’ right to life.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed within the bank and considering the fact that only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government businesses in regards to projects that could likely pose a public risk. This case is additionally noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long term public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found within the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is often a right to life itself.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject towards the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability inside the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution with the convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It is actually well-settled that here an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well founded now that the provision for proforma promotion is not really alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service construction but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if contented that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province inside the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of spend and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and regarded researchers to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.